Помоги проекту - поделись книгой:
4. Зенгер Х. Стратагемы. О китайском искусстве жить и выживать: в 2 т. М., 2004.
5. Лакофф Д., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем. М., 2008.
6. Луман Н. Реальность массмедиа. М., 2005.
7. Марков А.А. Связи с общественностью в органах власти. М., 2014.
8. Пономарев Н.Ф. Коммуникационный менеджмент: драматизация публичной политики. Пермь, 2014.
9. Попов В.Д. (общ. ред.). Информационная политика. М., 2003.
10. Русакова О.Ф., Русаков В.М. PR-дискурс: теоретико-методологический анализ. Екатеринбург, 2008.
11. Талеб Нассим Николас. Черный лебедь. М., 2009.
12. Хилгартнер С., Боск Ч.Л. Рост и упадок социальных проблем: концепция публичных арен // Средства массовой коммуникации и социальные проблемы: хрестоматия / сост. И.Г. Ясавеев. Казань, 2000. С. 18–53.
13. Appel M., Richter T. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion. A mediated moderation model // Media Psychology. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 101–135.
14. Birkland T.A. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting // Journal of Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 18 (1). P. 53–74.
15. Boswell J. Policy narratives in a deliberative system // Australian Political Science Association Conference. September 26–28, 2010. University of Melbourne.
16. Bovens M. Public accountability // The Oxford Handbook of Public Management / eds. E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 182–208.
17. Bülow-Møller A.V. Corporate apologia and the attribution of guilt // Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in present-day society / eds. L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, J. Strunck. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. P. 340–358.
18. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. The politics of agenda-building: An Alternative perspective for modern democratic theory // The Journal of Politics. 1971. № 33 (4). P. 892–915.
19. Gamson W.A. A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion // Symbolic Interaction. 1988. № 11. P. 161–174.
20. Green M.C., Strange J.J., Brock T.C. (eds.). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
21. Grunig J.E. Public relations and strategic management: Institutionalizing organization-public relationships in contemporary society // Central European Journal of Communication. 2011. № 1. P. 11–31.
22. Jones M.D., McBeth M.K. A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? // The Policy Studies Journal. 2010. Vol. 38 (2). P. 329–353.
23. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. N.Y.: Harper Collins Publishers, 1984/1995.
24. Kuklinski J.H., Quirk P.J. Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion // Elements of political reason / eds. A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, S. Popkin. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 153–182.
25. Marx G. External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: Some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications // The Dynamics of Social Movements / eds. M. Zald, J. McCarthy. Cambridge: Winthrop, 1979. P. 94—125.
26. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. The agenda setting function of mass media // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972. № 36. P. 176–185.
27. Mulligan K. Truth in fiction: The Consequences of fictional framing for political opinions // Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. June 19, 2012.
28. Pfetsch B. Government news management // The politics of news, the news of politics / eds. D. Graber, D. McQuail, P. Norris. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998. P. 70–93.
29. Schmidt V. A. Discursive institutionalism: The Explanatory power of ideas and discourse // Annual Review of Political Science. 2008. Vol. 11 (1). P. 303–326.
30. Scott M.B., Lyman S.M. Accounts // American Sociological Review. 1968. Vol. 33 (1). P. 46–62.
31. Stockwell S.E. Spin doctors, citizens and democracy // Government Communication in Australia / ed. S. Young. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 130–143.
32. Stoker K.L., Tusinski K.A. Reconsidering public relations’ infatuation with dialogue: Why engagement and reconciliation can be more ethical than symmetry and reciprocity // Journal of Mass Media Ethics (e-Publications@Marquette). 2006. Vol. 21 (2–3).
33. Stone D.A. Policy paradox and political reason: The Art of political decision making. N.Y: W.W. Norton and Company, 1988.
Список использованной литературы
1. Бодрунова С.С. Современные стратегии британской политической коммуникации. М., 2010.
2. Бурдье П. Клиническая социология поля науки // Социоанализ Пьера Бурдье. Альманах Российско-французского центра социологии и философии Института социологии Российской Академии наук / отв. ред. H.A. Шматко. М., 2001.
3. Бурдье П. О телевидении и журналистике. М., 2002.
4. Вежбицкая А. Сравнение – градация – метафора // Теория метафоры / ред. Н.Д. Арутюнова. М., 1990. C. 133–154.
5. Гудков Д.Б. Прецедентные феномены в текстах политического дискурса // Язык СМИ как объект междисциплинарного исследования / отв. ред. М.Н. Володина. М., 2003.
6. Дай Т., Зиглер Л. Демократия для элиты. Введение в американскую политику. М., 1984.
7. Зенгер Х. Стратагемы. О китайском искусстве жить и выживать: в 2 т. М., 2004.
8. Луман Н. Власть. М., 2001.
9. Луман Н. Реальность массмедиа. М., 2005.
10. Муфф Ш. К агонистической модели демократии // Логос. 2004. № 2 (42). P. 180–197.
11. Ноэль-Нойман Э. Общественное мнение. Открытие спирали молчания. М., 1996.
12. Ортега-и-Гассет Х. Восстание масс. М., 2003.
13. Русакова О.Ф., Русаков В.М. PR-дискурс: теоретико-методологический анализ. Екатеринбург, 2008.
14. Улановский А.М. Теория речевых актов и социальный конструкционизм // Постнеклассическая психология. Социальный конструкционизм и нарративный подход. 2004. № 1.
15. Хабермас Ю. Теория коммуникативного действия // Вестник Московского университета. Философия. 1993. № 4. C. 43–63.
16. Шумпетер Й.А. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.
17. Яноу Д., ван Хульст М. Фреймы политического: от фрейм-анализа к анализу фреймирования // Социологическое обозрение. 2011. Т 10. № 1–2. С. 87—113.
18. Altheide D.L. Media logic and political communication // Political Communication. 2004. Vol. 21 (3). P. 293–296.
19. Altheide D.L., Snow R.P. Media logic. London: Sage Publications, 1979.
20. Amsterdam A.G., Bruner J.S. Minding the law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
21. Appel M., Richter T. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion. A mediated moderation model // Media Psychology. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 101–135.
22. Arnold W.E., McCroskey J.C. The credibility of reluctant testimony // The Central States Speech Journal. 1967. Vol. 18. P. 97—103.
23. Arrow K. Social choice and individual values. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.
24. Baker S., Martinson D.L. The TARES test: Five principles for ethical persuasion // Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 2001. Vol. 16 (2–3). P. 148–175.
25. Baum M.A. Circling the wagons: Soft news and isolationism in American public opinion // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48 (2). P. 313–338.
26. Baum M.A. Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public // American Journal of Political Science. 2002. № 96. P. 91—109.
27. Baum M.A., Jamison A.S. The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently // The Journal of Politics. 2006. Vol. 68 (4). P. 946–959.
28. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: An Overview and assessment // Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. № 26. P. 611–639.
29. Bennett W.L. Beyond pseudoevents: Election news as reality TV // American Behavioral Scientist. 2005. Vol. 49 (3). P. 364–378.
30. Bennett W.L. News: The Politics of illusion. N.Y.: Longman, 1984.
31. Bennett W.L. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States // Journal of Communication. 1990. Vol. 40 (2). Р. 103–125.
32. Bennett W.L., Lawrence R., Livingston S. When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
33. Bentele G., Liebert T., Seeling S. Von der Determination zur Intereffikation: Ein integriertes Modell zum Verhaltnis von Public Relations und Journalimus // Aktuelle Entstehung von Offentlichkeit. Akteure, Strukturen, Veranderungen / eds. G. Bentele, M. Haller. Konstanz: UVK, 1997. S. 225–250.
34. Bessette J.M. Deliberative democracy: The Majority principle in republican government // How democratic is the constitution? // eds. R.A. Goldwin, W.A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980. P. 102–116.
35. Bird S.E. The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. N.Y.: Routledge, 2003.
36. Birkland T. A. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting // Journal of Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 18 (1). P. 53–74.
37. Bitzer L.F. The rhetorical situation // Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1968. № 1. P. 1—14.
38. Black М. Metaphor // Black M. Models and metaphor. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962. P. 25–47.
39. Blader S.L., Tyler T.R. A Four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a «fair» process // personality and social psychology bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29 (6). P.747–758.
40. Blumer H. Social problems as collective behavior // Social Problems. 1971. № 18. P. 298–306.
41. Blumler J.G., Kavanagh D. The Third Age of political communication: Influences and features // Political Communication. 1999. № 16. P. 209–230.
42. Boorstin D.J. The image: Or what happened to the American dream. N.Y.: Atheneum, 1962/1977.
43. Boswell J. Policy narratives in a deliberative system // Australian Political Science Association Conference, September 26–28, 2010, University of Melbourne.
44. Bovens M. Public accountability // The Oxford Handbook of Public Management / eds. E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 182–208.
45. Bülow-Møller A.V Corporate apologia and the attribution of guilt // Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in present-day society / eds. L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, J. Strunck. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. P. 340–358.
46. Calhoun C. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere // Habermas and the public sphere / ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. P. 1—50.
47. Campbell M.C., Docherty J.S. What’s in a frame? (that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet) // Marquette Law Review. 2004. Vol. 87 (4). P. 769–781.
48. Caplan B. The logic of collective belief // Independent Institute. Working Paper № 4. October 1999. URL: http://www.independent.org/pdf/working_papers/04_logic.pdf
49. Cappella J.N., Price V, Nir L. Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000 // Political Communication. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 73–93.
50. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context // Unintended thought / eds. J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1989. P. 212–252.
51. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. Participation in American politics: The Dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972/1983.
52. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. The politics of agenda-building: An Alternative perspective for modern democratic theory // The Journal of Politics. 1971. № 33 (4). P. 892–915.
53. Coman M. Media anthropology: An Overview // Paper for European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) Media Anthropology Network e-seminar May 17, 2005.
54. Cook T.E. Governing with the news: The News media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
55. Coombs W.T. The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis // Journal of Promotion Management. 2006. Vol. 12 (3). P. 241–260.
56. Craig G. Living with spin. Political and media relations in mediated public life // Southern Review. 2003. Vol. 36 (3). P. 82–91.
57. Crouse T Boys on the bus: Riding with the campaign press corps. N.Y.: Random House, 1973.
58. Cuthbertson G.M. Political myth and epic. Michigan: Michigan State University Press, 1975.
59. Dascal M. Two pronged dialectic / ed. M. Dascal. Leibniz: What kind of rationalist? // Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. P. 37–72.
60. Davies N. Flat Earth News: An аward-winning reporter exposes falsehood, distortion and propaganda in the Global Media. London: Chatto and Windus, 2008.
61. Davis A. Public relations democracy: Public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
62. Dayan D., Katz E. Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
63. de Vreese C.H., Elenbaas M. Media in the game of politics: Effects of strategic metacoverage on political cynicism // The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2008. Vol. 13 (3). Р. 285–309.
64. DiMaggio P.J. Interest and agency in institutional theory // Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment / ed. L.G. Zucker. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. P. 3—21.
65. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The Iron Cage Revisted: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. P. 147–160.
66. Dolezel L. Narrative worlds // Sound, sign and meaning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1979.
67. Donohue G.A., Tichenor P.J., Olien C.N. A guard dog perspective on the role of media // Journal of Communication. 1995. Vol. 45 (2). P. 115–132.
68. Downs A. An economic theory of political action in a democracy // The Journal of Political Economy. 1957. Vol. 65 (2). P. 135–150.
69. Downs A. Up and down with ecology – The «issue-attention cycle» // Public Interest. 1972. № 28. Р. 38–50.
Поделиться книгой: